What to Ask About Russian Hacking

What to Ask About Russian Hacking What to Ask About Russian Hacking On Monday, the House Intelligence Committee holds its first hearing on Russia's hacking of the decision. (No date has yet been set for the Senate Intelligence Committee's parallel examination.) The rundown of introductory witnesses does not move trust in the House board of trustees' adequacy. It ought to be generally simple to get at reality of whether there was arrangement between the Trump battle and Russia over the hacking. I have some significant experience. When I was an individual from Parliament in Britain, I partook in a select board of trustees examining charges of telephone hacking by the News Corporation. Today, as a New York-based writer (who, truth be told, now works at News Corp.), I have taken after the Russian hacking story intently. In November, I broke the story that a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act court had issued a warrant that empowered the F.B.I. to analyze interchanges between "U.S. people" in the Trump battle identifying with Russia-connected banks. Along these lines, I have a few thoughts for how the House council individuals ought to continue. In the event that I were Adam Schiff, the main Democrat on the advisory group, I would request to see the accompanying witnesses: Carter Page, Paul Manafort, Richard Burt, Erik Prince, Dan Scavino, Brad Parscale, Roger Stone, Corey Lewandowski, Boris Epshteyn, Rudolph Giuliani, Michael Flynn, Michael Flynn Jr., Felix Sater, Dmitry Rybolovlev, Michael Cohen, Jack Dorsey, Mark Zuckerberg, Peter Thiel, Robert and Rebekah Mercer, Stephen Bannon, Sebastian Gorka, Michael Anton, Julia Hahn and Stephen Miller, alongside officials from Cambridge Analytica, Alfa Bank, Silicon Valley Bank and Spectrum Health